Trust cards laid out on table during Berlin workshop discussion

Berlin Concept: How Seniors Could Redesign Digital Banking

A proposed workshop bringing together older adults to audit fraud detection and cybersecurity authentication AI in digital banking, creating governance recommendations for financial institutions.

The Challenge We Would Address

€2M+

Lost Annually to Fraud

Seniors losing millions as AI fraud detection systems and authentication methods fail to protect them

90%+

No Recourse When AI Fails

Most users have no way to fix problems when automated systems make mistakes

Interfaces designed for digital natives

Assuming knowledge that was never taught

No human support when AI fails

Endless menus instead of real help

Fraud exploiting confusion

Scammers taking advantage of complex systems

Trust completely broken

People avoiding banking out of fear

Proposed Workshop Journey

Choose the AI System
Step 1

Choose the AI System

25-30 seniors gather at a Berlin community center to select an AI system to audit - focusing on fraud detection and cybersecurity authentication in online banking that affects their daily lives

Learn How It Works
Step 2

Learn How It Works

Facilitator explains how banking AI makes decisions about fraud and security. Participants share their experiences and understanding of what the AI does with their data

Rate Trust Principles
Step 3

Rate Trust Principles

Small groups use Trust Cards to rate the banking AI on all 5 principles - Clarity, Care, Repair, Reciprocity, and Oversight - documenting every concern and frustration

Review Results & Trust Scores
Step 4

Review Results & Trust Scores

Groups share their ratings and calculate overall trust scores. A wall of insights emerges showing systematic failures in how banking AI is designed

Create Solutions & Take Action
Step 5

Create Solutions & Take Action

From problems to possibilities - participants sketch and design what trustworthy banking could look like, then commit to next steps for advocacy and change

Example Insights We Might Hear

"The AI assumes I know things I was never taught"

Example participant

"When something goes wrong, I need a human, not another menu"

Example participant

"Make the AI help me verify, not decide for me"

Example participant

Projected Trust Breakdown

Based on preliminary research, we expect participants would rate digital banking violations of trust principles at these levels

78%
Clarity

Couldn't understand AI decisions

89%
Care

System didn't consider their needs

92%
Repair

No recourse when things went wrong

84%
Reciprocity

Felt exploited, not served

95%
Oversight

Wanted human control restored

Potential Solutions & Outcomes

Value for Financial Institutions

This audit methodology could provide banks and cybersecurity companies with:

  • Direct insights from vulnerable user populations to reduce fraud and improve security
  • Community-validated governance frameworks for AI systems
  • Actionable recommendations for building trustworthy digital banking interfaces
  • Risk mitigation strategies based on lived experience rather than assumptions
  • Innovation opportunities for new security and verification tools

Potential Impact

3+
Banks Interested

Financial institutions seeking insights

40%
Fraud Reduction Goal

Target improvement from changes

2+
Innovation Opportunities

New tools based on insights

5+
Cities Could Replicate

Scalable audit model

"This is the kind of participatory approach that could transform how we build trustworthy AI systems."

— Vision for the project

How to Replicate This Approach

1

Identify Your Community's Tech Challenge

What technology is causing harm or breaking trust?

2

Gather 15-30 Affected People

Those with lived experience are the experts

3

Use the Trust Principles Framework

Our workshop materials guide the conversation

4

Document Insights and Recommendations

Capture both problems and solutions

5

Share with Policymakers and Companies

Turn insights into real change